misinformation researchers relying on data Facebook may have lost work to them for months or even years. This is because the social network gives them imperfect and incomplete information on how users interact with posts and links on the website. New York Times.
Facebook has been giving academics access to its data for the past few years to monitor the spread of misinformation on its platform. It promised researchers transparency and access. everything user interaction, but the data the company gives them reportedly only includes interactions for about half of its US users. In addition, most of the users whose interactions are covered in the reports are politically enough to reveal their inclinations.
In an email to researchers Times I saw it, Facebook apologized for the “inconvenience” [it] The company also told them it fixed the problem, but it could take weeks because of too much data to process. USA is not wrong.
Facebook spokesperson Mavis Jones accused the data inaccuracy of a “technical error” that the company is apparently “working to fix quickly”. Aspect Times Notes, the first to discover the inaccuracy was associate professor Fabio Giglietto of the University of Urbino. Giglietto compared the data provided to the researchers with the social network “The Widely Viewed Content Report”. published It was publicly in August and found that the results did not match.
After this report was published, other researchers expressed their concerns. Alice Marwick, a researcher at the University of North Carolina, said: Engadget He said they could not verify these results because they did not have access to the data Facebook used. The company reportedly made a phone call with investigators on Friday to apologize. Megan Squire, one of these researchers, said: Times: “From a humanitarian perspective, there were 47 people on that call today, and each of these projects is at risk, and some are completely destroyed.”
Some researchers use their own tools to gather information for their research, but in at least one case Facebook has cut off their access. on Facebook in August disabled Accounts associated with the NYU Advertising Observatory project. The team used a browser extension to gather information about political ads, but the social network said it was “unauthorized scraping.” Laura Edelson, the project’s principal investigator at the time, said: Engadget Facebook is silencing the team as “his work often draws attention to problems with its platform”. Edelson added: “If this section shows anything, it’s that Facebook should not have veto power over who is allowed to review them.”